Tremors 2: Aftershocks (1996)


I watched “Tremors” a few months ago but didn’t review it, because it might be the perfect B-movie and I’d only spoil it with my words. Seriously, not a weak moment – every performance perfectly judged, funny, inventive special effects, pretty exciting at times…”Tremors” is an all-time great, no doubt about it. It was so good that it inspired four sequels, and I feel a bit more confident about reviewing them.


Director Ron Underwood (who also made “City Slickers”, and…”Pluto Nash”) doesn’t return, and instead directing duties are handled by part 1’s writer, S. S. Wilson. Wilson’s written at least one decent movie – “Short Circuit”; one I liked but no-one else did – “Wild Wild West”; and lots of rubbish – “Ghost Dad”, for one, starring rapist Bill Cosby. This and part 4 represent the entirety of his directing career, and he hasn’t really done anything since the turn of the millennium, so let’s see how good it was.


“Not very”, is the simple answer. The Graboids from part 1 are back, but in Mexico this time, and they’ve forced an oil field to shut down by killing a bunch of the miners. Although a person might reasonably think “they must have done all sorts of tests on those creatures, and the Army will have figured out a way to blow them up”, the people behind this movie didn’t, so the owners of the oil field call on…Earl Bassett! Yes, Fred Ward was happy to come back for the sequel, but Kevin Bacon was not, possibly because it was straight-to-video and Kevin was getting paid better for starring in the Oscar-nominated “Sleepers” at the time.


Joining Earl is Grady Hoover, who’s the Bacon replacement (Facon?) and whose sole qualification is he’s the first guy the Mexicans met when they went to Earl’s town to find him. He’s played by Chris Gartin, who sort of looks like four different actors, depending on his facial expression and the way he’s stood. Despite Grady being so stupid he doesn’t even know what rock, paper, scissors is, they start off well, developing a solid system for killing the creatures which earns them a fortune ($50,000 a graboid), until they sort of start fighting back, so they decide to bring in reinforcements in the shape of the guy who stole part 1 with his brilliant performance, Michael Gross as Bert Gummer.


It’s around this point when I turned against the movie, really. It’s a small thing, but…anyway, he drives up with a huge truck full of guns and explosives, and there’s an ADRed line about how the Mexican army gave them all to him, obviously as someone in the editing bay went “how did he get all these deadly weapons over the border?” But then he starts talking about a new rifle he’s got, which clearly wasn’t a gift, and it’s a whole mess. Pay attention to the details, people.


This is as nothing compared to the second half of the movie, though. Sequels, the good ones anyway, have to have some sort of escalated threat, whether in numbers, size or circumstances (for instance: the monsters are moving towards a big city! Or humanity is dying out and can’t fight them as well any more! You know the sort of thing I mean), but it’s important that they try and stick to some part of the formula that made the previous movie successful enough to warrant a sequel. “Tremors 2”, on the other hand, decides to just recreate the climax of part 1, with them in a small location trying to move round on top of buildings, but with slightly different creatures. Yes, the graboids  (who grab no-one in the course of the movie, because that effect was clearly too expensive to recreate) are actually larva for creatures we’ll come to know in part 3 as “shriekers” – sort of graboid-looking things that run round on two legs.


The graboids have been around since pre-Cambrian times, apparently, when the only other creatures were single-celled (this is from the movie, not some weird theory I have), yet these two-legged things have never showed up anywhere, ever, until 1996 in Mexico? No explanation is given, although the original movie was supposed to be set in Australia (with Kevin Bacon returning) until the budget was cut by 75%. I could see them having evolved differently there, even though the movie sort of explicitly says they haven’t evolved in hundreds of millions of years, but…ah, I don’t know.


It commits the worst B-movie crime, of being boring. There’s not a second of this movie where you’re not thinking about how you’d rather be watching the first one, but for the last twenty minutes, it’s pretty difficult to keep your attention on the screen. It’s exactly what “Tremors” would have been with a poor director and no Kevin Bacon in it, which is sort of alright but completely forgettable.


Rating: thumbs down



One thought on “Tremors 2: Aftershocks (1996)

  1. Pingback: Youtube Film Club: Cast A Deadly Spell (1991) |

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s